PROF.DRRAM ,HIV/AIDS,SEX DIS.,SEX WEAK.& ABORTION SPECIALIST
profdrram@gmail.com,+917838059592,+919832025033,DELHI –NCR,IND
HIV/ AIDS,CANCER LATEST MEDICINES AVAILABLE AT CHEAP RATE.
FOLLOW ON FACE BOOK:www.facebook.com/ramkumar
FOLLOW ON TWITTER:www.twitter.com/profdrram

Every two years, researchers, implementers, policy makers, and community activists come together at the International AIDS Conference to take stock of the pandemic: Where are we now? Where have we been? Where are we heading? Discoveries are heralded and strategies dissected. There are always more questions than answers, but there is one question that needs to be answered at AIDS 2014 and beyond: Do we conssider fot diagnosis,care and treatment of key poor aafected persons like flying or commercial sex workers,stigmatised and criminalised members of LGBRT ,many fall prey to MEN to MEN SEX ,drug injectors,trangenders,migratory labors and even truck drivers who move from one place to another for lifehood and ultimatelyfall prey to unsafe sex?
On a basic level, the answer must be a resounding and unequivocal “YES!” Every human life counts. Every life has equal value. Yet, while an affirmative chorus may echo in the halls of the conference, easy rhetoric will not be enough.Data analysis by UNAIDS indicates that as many as half of all new HIV infections globally occur in key populations. This should come as no surprise. The disproportional concentration of the virus in these groups is hardly news.Though we are frequently reminded that we are in the era of evidence-based public health, data-driven decision-making, and performance-based metrics, the evidence on HIV vulnerability in key populations is routinely ignored. We aren’t even counted in many places. Surveillance fails to find us. Not surprisingly, funding for HIV services responsive to our needs remains slight.

On July 11, 2014, the World Health Organisation released a long-awaited and rapidly developed publication, Consolidated Guidelines on HIV Prevention, Diagnosis, Treatment and Care for Key Populations. It is an impressive document written and reviewed by a Who’s Who of experts working with and representing these groups.

There can be no doubt about the sincerity or good intentions of the guidelines’ authors, and this document has the potential to influence policy and practice globally. Yet questions persist in the willingness of institutions — governments, donors, development agencies and civil society — to embrace their fundamental responsibility to the health of key populations and invest accordingly in a sustained and broad-based effort to end the unremitting toll of HIV and AIDS on our lives.
As existenec of UNO under which WHO works compromised in this world politics where nations are fighting with each other with no listening to UNO and its world bank and financial institutions are many time politicall driven as their funds decide on poerful countries like USA,UK,GERMANY, AUSTRALIA,FRANCE,CHINA ,RUSSIA ETC which provide fund for the welfare of hiv people in south usa,african and asian countries where such poor key persons of HIV RESIDE