ARTIFICIAL CORNEA OR KERATOPROSTHESIS
Kisan Jadhav (name changed) was studying for his master’s degree in history in Jalna, a small town in central Maharashtra. He was a studious, quiet youngster, intent on realizing his dream of becoming a professor after completing his Ph.D. His life changed one day, when some miscreants, mistaking him for someone else, threw acid upon his face. He was admitted to the local hospital with extensive chemical burns of the face and both eyes severely damaged.
Several months of painful reconstructive surgeries later his face regained some semblance of normalcy. Unfortunately he was totally blind both eyes. The left eye had shrunk to a third of its size and was unable to even perceive light. The right eye could perceive light, but the cornea was totally opaque and the eye was bone dry with virtually no tear production. In such a situation with inadequate tear secretion, a corneal graft is doomed to failure. Fortunately, his eye surgeons had heard of a new treatment suitable for such patients. He was referred to Mumbai and operated upon in 2 stages and an artificial cornea or Pintucci keratoprosthesis was implanted in his right eye. It is now one year since this surgery. Kisan has 6/6 or normal distance vision with glasses and can read the tiniest of print without any glasses. He has resumed his studies and has passed his MA exam.
These are some of the frequently asked questions about keratoprosthesis or KP.

Q. Who are suitable candidates for KP?
A. Those who are blind in both eyes, with at least accurate perception of light in the better eye. The surgery is done in only one eye.

Q. Can those who have had corneal grafting surgery multiple times, which have failed be operated for KP?
A. Yes, those who have had repeatedly failed or rejected corneal grafts are excellent candidates for KP, provided sonography shows the retina is intact and there is no severe glaucoma.

Q. What about those with corneal opacity who have been refused corneal transplant because of dry eye or very vascularised cornea or diseases like pemphigus or Stevens Johnson syndrome or chemical burns where corneal transplant is not advised?
A. Such patients can be operated upon for KP surgery.

Q. Is this surgery expensive?
A. Yes, the cost of the Pintucci Keratoprosthesis, which is imported from Europe, is very high. Besides, the surgery is technically demanding. It is done in 2 stages, 2 months apart. Each stage surgery lasts for 2-3 hours. Some tissue also needs to taken from the patient’s mouth. It is generally done under general anaesthesia. It is however cheaper than

Q. Can this surgery be done instead of a corneal graft?
A. No. This is a surgery of last resort. It is done only for those who have failed grafts or in whom grafting is not advisable. Corneal grafting is still the treatment of first choice for those with opaque corneas and adequate tears.

Q. Can the KP be rejected?
A. No. It is made of the same material that most IOLs are made – polymethylmethacylate or PMMA, which is an inert plastic.

Q. What is the success rate?
A. The author has done approximately75 cases so far, with a follow up of 12 years. The success rate, i.e. those patients retaining useful vision after the surgery is 65% in the author’s hands. The late Dr. Stefano Pintucci, the inventor of this device, had done over a 1500 cases over 20 years with a similar success rate.

Q. What about other KP devices?
A. There are several other designs available in the market. The 3 commonest besides the Pintucci are a) the Daljit Singh champagne cork KP (done by the Singh group based in Amritsar, India, which uses stainless steel sutures to secure the KP in the eye – this group has the largest series reported in the world)
b) the OOKP or Osteo-Odonto KP also called the “eye-in tooth” KP. This requires use of a healthy canine tooth from the patient. It can only be done in adults and requires a team approach, including a dentist. Till late 2008, a few have been implanted mainly in Chennai, India. Besides Rome, Italy, it is also done in Birmingham, UK and in Singapore in significant numbers.
c) The Boston KP or the Dohlmann KP. This is an American design and enjoys good popularity in the US and Latin America. It requires a donor cornea as well. It is a simpler technique and is done in one stage. The cosmetic appearance is also better. The author has started doing this procedure in Mumbai from February 2009, in select cases. He has also demonstrated this surgery to an audience of 200 ophthalmologists in Bangalore, restoring sight to a man blind in both eyes since over a dozen years, prior to the surgery.
Q. You do tend to brag, any opportunity you get. Is there a difference in patient selection between the Pintucci and the Boston KP?
A. I will ignore the first sentence. Yes there is a difference in patient selection criteria. The Boston KP needs the patient to have some amount of tear production. The patient should also not have any history of corneal melt, nor should he suffer from systemic diseases that could result in corneal melt. Therefore it is done in damaged or diseased corneas where the severity of the disease is less. For very severe dry eyes, with melted corneas such as Stevens’ Johnson Syndrome or chemical injuries, the Pintucci KP works best.