World's first medical networking and resource portal

News & Highlights
Please make use of the search function to browse preferred content
Medical News & Updates
May 09
What Are The Advantages Of Minimally Invasive Surgery For Hip Replacement?
With the evolution of new surgical methods, better anesthesia techniques, and computer navigation systems, surgeons are now able to reduce recovery times after hip replacement. The effects of such methods and technologies allow the surgeon to operate with greater precision and less injury to the body. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Joint Replacement (MIS) is one surgical approach with this goal in mind.

The term, however, can be misleading. In a broad sense, minimally invasive surgery for hip replacement refers to a surgical method that uses a smaller incision. Many surgeons have this goal in mind already, and incorporate it into the existing techniques for a traditional hip replacement. An article put out by the University of Missouri-Columbia School of Medicine reads:

"Minimally invasive surgery variations of both the posterior approach and the lateral approach are popular today, and these involve re-training surgeons to learn how to do the same approach using a smaller skin opening. Most surgeons refer to an incision that is 4 inches or less in length as 'minimally invasive.'"

But there are new surgical methods, also called minimally invasive, which go beyond making the smaller incision. These new surgical methods avoid cutting into the muscle altogether, which distinguishes them from traditional methods. Fewer surgeons are trained in these methods and special instruments and implants are required. One example is the MIS-2 incision hip replacement. The same article put out by the University of Missouri-Columbia School of Medicine describes the difference between a surgical method that makes a smaller incision and the MIS-2:

"What is new is the adaptation of this previously described pathway of reaching the hip joint to a new method of performing hip replacement surgery using two incisions that are very small. More important than the incision size or number is the fact that under the skin, the muscles are spread in their natural planes. The surgeon navigates a path around the muscles, without cutting into them."

The advantage of any minimally invasive surgery is less injury to the body. With more radical approaches, such as MIS-2 incision, there is reduced trauma to the deep muscle tissues and underlying structure of the hip. Because of the reduced trauma, patients feel better and recover faster. However, always remember that the size of the incision will be dictated by the size of the implants and the need to be able to manipulate them inside the joint to get the optimal positioning. Getting accurate positioning is key to the success of the entire procedure. The physicians at the University of Missouri-Columbia School of Medicine write:

"With modern hip replacement surgeries, the person is encouraged to become mobile much earlier than with standard methods of hip replacements. Many people are able to get out of bed either the same day or the next day, with the help of a physical therapist. In many cases outpatient therapy is not necessary, although it can help certain patients."

This should not give the reader the impression that minimally invasive surgical techniques are free of risks and complications. Blood-clots, for example, still occur and surgeons must apply methods to reduce them. In addition, most surgeons will still restrict the patient for six weeks after the surgery.

Keep in mind that all surgery is invasive to the body. These new surgical techniques merely reduce injury and trauma. If you believe you may be a candidate for minimally invasive hip replacement surgery, do research, talks with doctors, and always weigh the short-term benefits and the long-term results.

May 09
Study Shows Why Some Artery Plaques Are Deadlier Than Others
A new US study found why a very small proportion of arterial plaques become deadly and lead to heart attack or stroke and why the vast majority others stay benign and apparently do no harm.


The study was the work of researchers at Columbia University Medical Center, and New York University Medical Center, both in New York, and is published in the 6 May issue of Cell Metabolism.

The researchers said that many people are wrong to believe that all arterial plaques inevitably result in heart attack or stroke and their study found out why so few of them are actually worth worrying about.

They also found an important protein that may be responsible for benign plaques turning into dangerous one.

While most atherosclerotic lesions are harmless, only about 2 per cent of them will eventually cause an acute and often fatal blood clot that leads to heart attack, sudden death or stroke, said the researchers.

What distinguishes a dangerous plaque from a benign one is the "billion dollar question" said Dr Ira Tabas, who is Richard J Stock Professor and Vice Chairman of Research, at the Department of Medicine at Columbia University and Professor of Medicine and Anatomy and Cell Biology.

Plaques or atherosclerotic lesions, are fatty, inflamed deposits that form on the inside walls of arteries. These deposits also collect white blood cells known as macrophages and the lesions build up at various spots along blood vessel walls, said Tabas, adding that it is not the size of the deposit but what lies beneath the surface that makes it a dangerous one.

He likened it to the magma or molten lava inside a volcano: rumblings in the core, which in the case of arterial plaques is made of dead cells, can erupt, and once a plaque ruptures it can form a blood clot in the lumen or the interior space of the artery through which the blood flows.

Their finding supports the idea that so-called endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress together with the body's natural way of coping with that stress is one reason why the rupture takes place.

The ER of a cell does two things: it makes, folds and transports new proteins; and it controls the storage and release of the cell's store of calcium.

When something disturbs the cell's normal operation, it kicks into action a pathway called the unfolded protein response (UPR) which triggers cell suicide in those cells that are particularly stressed. The trigger for cell suicide is an ER stress effector conveniently called CHOP.

Tabas said it's OK for cells to die as long as they don't do so in large numbers. The ER pathway, when it works well, protects the whole organism, killing a a few cells here and there, But more and more scientists are beginning to realize that ER stress and the body's "overexuberant" reaction to it are common features of underlying neurodegenerative disease, aging, and diabetes, he said.

While earlier studies had suggested a link between ER stress and vulnerable plaques, this is the first to show a clear causal link between the two, said Tabas.

"It is this sudden clotting that restricts blood flow and can cause a heart attack, stroke, or sudden cardiac death," said Tabas, explaining that in our modern world most people have atherosclerosis by the time they reach the age of 20, and the challenge for the future will be stopping the harmless lesions in young people from becoming dangerous ones, or as he put it "soothing dangerous plaques so they don't rupture as we age".

Tabas said it was not obvious how to do that yet. There could be many reasons why plaques turn from benign to dangerous, but one of these is definitely linked to the presence of dead cells inside them, the necrotic core as the researchers termed it.

The dead cells release substances that weaken to cap that covers the lesion and hence allow it to erupt and trigger the formation of a clot, said Tabas.

For the study, Tabas and colleagues fed two groups of mice bred to have atherosclerosis a diet high in fat and cholesterol for 10 weeks. One group of mice had the CHOP gene deleted while the other did not. The mice without the CHOP gene produced smaller plaques than those with CHOP. But more importantly, the mice without the CHOP gene also showed 50 per cent lower rates of cell death and plaque necrosis.

Repeating the experiment with another strain of atherosclerotic mice showed essentially the same result, they noted.

Although previous studies have pointed to ER stress and UPR before, Tabas said their result still surprised them, especially the size of the effect.

"The fact that we were able to isolate one gene encoding one protein with such a profound effect on plaque necrosis was a big surprise," he said.

They were surprised because they were expecting this to be just one of many processes at work, including some that might compensate for the loss of the CHOP gene.

Tabas said that finding this effect in mice could translate to real clinical benefits for humans.

The finding opens the possibility that drugs targeting the CHOP gene could silence ER cell stress and be an effective way of treating heart disease, the number one killer in the US.

While cholesterol busting drugs can reduce the number of plaques that deposit inside arteries, they don't work for everyone, and besides, the deposits start quite early in life, with fatty streaks appearing in our arteries in our teens and plaques appearing in our 20s.

"A therapy that prevents the deaths of these cells may be able to reduce the number of vulnerable plaques and prevent heart attacks and strokes in the 70 percent of people who aren't protected from cholesterol-lowering drugs," said Tabas.

However, it might be years before an effective therapy based on this discovery is generally available, said the researchers, but it may be possible to bypass the problem of cell death by persuading other cells inside the plaque to capture and eliminate the dead cells before they can cause eruption.

In the meantime, there is another, well tested way. Although our knowledge of atherosclerosis may be changing, the best option may not, it may still be to have a healthy diet, take plenty of exercise, and keep an eye on cholesterol and blood pressure, said Tabas.

May 09
X-Rays Help Predict Permanent Bone Damage From Bisphosphonates
Breast cancer patients, individuals at risk for osteoporosis and those undergoing certain types of bone cancer therapies often take drugs containing bisphosphonates. These drugs have been found to place people at risk for developing osteonecrosis of the jaws (a rotting of the jaw bones). Dentists, as well as oncologists, are now using X-rays to detect "ghost sockets" in patients that take these drugs and when these sockets are found, it signals that the jawbone is not healing the right way. Early detection of these ghost sockets can help the patient avoid permanent damage to their jawbone, according to an article in the March/April 2009 issue of General Dentistry, the Academy of General Dentistry's (AGD) clinical, peer-reviewed journal.

A ghost socket occurs when the jawbone is not healing and repairing itself the right way. "The good news is that even though these ghost sockets may occur, by using radiographic techniques we can see that the soft tissue above these sockets can still heal," according to Kishore Shetty, DDS, MS, MRCS, lead author of the report. Dr. Shetty states these findings are important news to learn about because early prevention and detection can halt permanent damage from happening to a patient's jawbone.

In 2006, about 191 million prescriptions of oral bisphosphonates worldwide were written. The National Osteoporosis Foundation estimates that nearly 44 million people in the United States are at risk for developing osteoporosis. Currently, approximately 10 million Americans suffer from the disease.

Bisphosphonates are a family of drugs used to prevent and treat osteoporosis, multiple myeloma, Paget's disease (bone cancers), and bone metastasis from other cancers. These drugs can bond to bone surfaces and prevent osteoclasts (cells that break down bone) from doing their job. Other cells are still working trying to form bone, but it may turn out to be less healthy bone leading to the ghost-like appearance on X-rays.

"Healthy bones can easily regenerate," says Dr. Shetty. "But, because jawbones have rapid cell turnover, they can fail to heal properly in patients taking any of the bisphosphonate drugs. It's very important for patients to know about complications from dental surgery or extractions. Since these drugs linger in the bone indefinitely, they may upset the cell balance in how the jaws regenerate and remove unhealthy bone."

According to AGD spokesperson Carolyn Taggart-Burns, DDS, FAGD, patients who are taking bisphosphonates should inform their dentist to prevent complications from dental surgical procedures.

"Widespread use of bisphosphonates to prevent or treat early osteoporosis in relatively young women and the likelihood of long-term use is a cause for concern," says Dr. Taggart-Burns.

Drs. Shetty and Taggart-Burns agree that, "how bisphosphonates interfere with healing after dental surgery is still unclear and further research will be needed. It is imperative that the public understands there is no present treatment or cure for this problem."

May 09
New Research Under Way To Study Treatment For Older Adults With Bipolar Disorder
Continuing their groundbreaking research into the treatment of mood disorders in older adults, psychiatrists at the Weill Cornell Institute of Geriatric Psychiatry at the NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Westchester Division in White Plains will begin new studies on the effects of quetiapine (Seroquel: Astra Zeneca) and lamotrigine (Lamictal: GlaxoSmithKline). Although both drugs have been approved for aspects of the treatment of patients with bipolar disorder, to date there has been limited research into their effects on older adults with bipolar depression.

The studies are being led by Dr. Robert C. Young, professor of psychiatry at Weill Cornell Medical College, and his colleagues at the Institute of Geriatric Psychiatry. With more than 30 years of clinical and research experience, Dr. Young's focus has been to develop information that can improve the treatment of older adults suffering severe mood disorders.

Dr. Young, an attending psychiatrist at NewYork-Presbyterian/Westchester, said: "To date, most bipolar disorder treatment studies have been conducted in younger patients. In some older bipolar patients a good symptom response is difficult to achieve, and they often have recurring symptoms, disability, multiple medical disorders and increased mortality rates. We hope that findings from these studies will help physicians better manage the care of their geriatric bipolar patients."

Eligible participants must be 60 years of age or older with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder and currently suffering from symptoms of depression. They will be required to meet with a psychiatrist one day per week for a few hours and receive medication management from the treatment team.

Dr. Young and his colleagues are also continuing to lead another study, funded by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) and now in its fourth year, comparing the efficacy of two commonly used mood stabilizers, lithium and valproate, for the treatment of bipolar disorder in older adults. To date, more than 140 individuals in six study sites across the United States including NewYork-Presbyterian/Westchester have participated.

Dr. Young added: "We've heard from some participants in the NIMH study that they have gotten satisfaction in knowing that the findings from this important research may be of benefit to other older individuals -- now and in the years ahead -- who are similarly afflicted with bipolar disorder."

Bipolar disorder involves periods of elevated mood -- mania or hypomania -- and periods of depression, or "mixed" episodes in which patients have both kinds of symptoms. Examples of manic symptoms are high levels of energy, going without sleep for extended periods, elated mood or irritability, and impulsive or reckless behavior. Patients may not recognize that they are having symptoms.

May 09
Brain Cell Mechanism For Decision Making Also Underlies Judgment About Certainty
Countless times a day people judge their confidence in a choice they are about to make -- that they now can safely turn left at this intersection, that they aren't sure of their answer on a quiz, that their hot coffee has cooled enough to drink.

University of Washington (UW) researchers who study how the brain makes decisions are uncovering the biological mechanisms behind the belief that a choice is likely to be correct. Their most recent results will be published in the May 8 edition of Science.

"Choice certainty," noted one of the researchers, Dr. Roozbeh Kiani, "allows us to translate our convictions into suitable actions." Several other research projects have shown that choice certainty is closely associated with reaction time and with decision accuracy.

Kiani and the co-author of the May 8 Science article, Michael N. Shadlen are members of the UW Department of Physiology and Biophysics and of the National Primate Research Center. Shadlen is also an investigator in the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

The researchers tested the possibility that the same brain cell mechanism that underlies decision making might also underlie judgments about certainty. In their study, rhesus monkeys played a video game in which they watched a dynamic, random dot display. They then had to determine the direction of motion. The difficulty of the task was varied by both the percentage of moving dots and the viewing time. After a short delay, the fixation point faded. This cued the monkey to indicate its choice of direction by moving its eyes toward one of two targets. The monkey would receive a reward for each correct choice, and no reward for an incorrect choice.

On a random half of the trials, the monkey could pass on making a choice and instead pick a third, fixed-position target that guaranteed a small reward. While watching the moving dots, the monkeys didn't know whether this third option would be offered. The sure bet was shown during the short delay.

"The monkeys opted for the sure target when the chance of making a correct decision about the motion direction was small," the researchers noted. They picked the sure bet more frequently when the visual evidence was weaker and duration shorter.

According to the researchers, when the monkeys waived the sure-bet option, they more accurately picked the correct direction than when the wager wasn't offered. This occurred at all levels of difficulty, suggesting that the monkeys chose the sure bet because of uncertainty, not because that round of the game was too hard.

The researchers recorded activity from 70 brain cells while the monkeys made their decisions. The cells were located in the lateral intraparietal cortex of the brain. The parietal lobe is located just under the crown of the head and plays a role in spatial sensations. In rhesus monkeys, the lateral area of the parietal lobe is attuned to movement.

The researchers found that the pattern of firing activity in these brain nerve cells could predict the direction choice and whether the monkey would opt out of the direction decision by taking the sure bet when it was offered. Normally, these brain cells change their firing rates as evidence accrues for one direction or the other, ultimately giving rise to a clear decision through high or low firing rates.

On some trials, however, these same brain cells seemed to dilly-dally and achieve an intermediate "gray zone" of activity. Those were the trials where the monkey declared uncertainty by choosing the sure-bet target.

Analysis of the detailed data from the study results show that the mechanism underlying certainty in these brain cells is linked to the same evidence accumulation that underlies choice and decision time.

"Some research has suggested that brain cells in an area associated with reward expectation or conflict are associated with decision uncertainty," Kiani noted. "However, these brain cells presumably receive this information from neurons involved in decision making."

The results of this study, according to the authors, advance the understanding of brain cell mechanisms that underlie decision making by coupling for the first time the mechanisms that lead to decision formation and the establishment of a degree of confidence in that decision.

"This simple mechanism," the authors said, "brings certainty, which is commonly conceived as a subjective aspect of decision making, under the same rubric as choice and reaction time."

According to the researchers, it is likely that these cells also carry the relevant signals for assigning the probability of receiving a reward. The researchers noted that it seems likely that this computation of choice certainty is passed from the lateral parietal cortex to brain structures that anticipate reward, and that the response from these structures influence the decision to pick or forgo the sure bet if it is offered.

May 08
Lithium In Drinking Water 'May Reduce Suicide'
Very low levels of lithium in drinking water may help prevent suicide in the general population, according to a new study.

The study has prompted calls for further research into the possibility of adding lithium to drinking supplies - like water fluoridation to improve dental health.

Researchers at Oita University in Japan measured lithium levels in tap water in 18 municipalities in the Oita region. The lithium levels ranged between 0.7µg/l (micrograms per litre) and 59µg/l.

The researchers then calculated the suicide rate in each of the 18 municipalities. They found that the suicide rate was significantly lower in those areas with the highest levels of lithium in the water.

Writing in the May issue of the British Journal of Psychiatry, the researchers said: "Our study suggests that very low levels of lithium in drinking water can lower the risk of suicide. Very low levels may possess an antisuicidal effect."

Lithium is a naturally occurring metal found in variable amounts in food and water. In medicine, very high doses are used to treat bipolar disorder and mood disorders. But so far the potential benefit of using low levels of lithium to reduce the risk of suicide has not been studied closely.

Vancouver-based psychiatrist Professor Allan Young has described the study as "intriguing".

Commenting on the Japanese study in the same issue of the British Journal of Psychiatry, Professor Young said: "A logical first step would be for the Medical Research Council to convene an expert working party to examine the available evidence and suggest further research.

"Large-scale trials involving the addition of lithium to drinking water supplies may then be feasible, although this would undoubtedly be subject to considerable debate. Following up on these findings will not be straightforward or inexpensive, but the eventual benefits for community mental health may be considerable."

May 08
Tear Research Focused On Contact Lens Risks, Benefit
Contact lenses are great for sight, but do they have an impact on general eye health? Researchers at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) School of Optometry are working to answer that question by analyzing tears.

Biological changes in the eye can be measured through minor fluctuations in the level of inflammatory proteins called cytokines, which are present in the tear film. Cytokines are strong indicators of overall eye health, especially in contact wearers.

For the UAB study, volunteers were prescribed a type of contact lens called silicone hydrogels to wear daily or for a 30-day schedule, said Lucy Kehinde, a UAB doctoral student in the Vision Sciences Graduate Program and the lead researcher. Her early tear-research results show that even minor changes in eye biology can inform lens-wear prescribing and patient preference.

"It is helping us to understand and get a clearer picture of eye health during the course of a month, which is the length of time some people choose to keep in their extended-wear contacts," Kehinde said. "The choice between lenses should be taken seriously in terms of reducing the risk of eye infections and other sight problems."

Kehinde presents her research at the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) annual meeting May 3-7 in Fort Lauderdale, Fla.

The study included 80 volunteers who collected their tears in ultra-thin glass tubes smaller than a coffee stirrer. The participants were trained to hold the collection end of the tube very close to the ocular surface without touching the eye. Study tears must be non-stimulated since cytokine levels are skewed by stimulated or emotional tears.

The research also is helping to narrow down the cytokine markers important to eye-disease prevention and treatment, Kehinde said. "We may be able to use this data to develop new diagnostic tools that would identify good candidates for extended-wear lenses, or find those who are better suited for daily-wear lenses," she said.

May 08
Acupuncture Eases Radiation-Induced Dry Mouth In Cancer Patients
Twice weekly acupuncture treatments relieve debilitating symptoms of xerostomia - severe dry mouth - among patients treated with radiation for head and neck cancer, researchers from The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center report in the current online issue of Head & Neck.

Xerostomia develops after the salivary glands have been exposed to repeated doses of therapeutic radiation. People who have cancers of the head and neck typically receive large cumulative doses, rendering the salivary glands incapable of producing adequate saliva, said Mark S. Chambers, M.S., D.M.D., a professor in the Department of Dental Oncology. Saliva substitutes, lozenges and chewing gum bring only temporary relief, and the commonly prescribed medication, pilocarpine, has short-lived benefits and bothersome side effects of its own.

"The quality of life in patients with radiation-induced xerostomia is profoundly impaired," said Chambers, the study's senior author. "Symptoms can include altered taste acuity, dental decay, infections of the tissues of the mouth, and difficulty with speaking, eating and swallowing. Conventional treatments have been less than optimal, providing short-term response at best."

M. Kay Garcia, LAc, Dr.P.H., a clinical nurse specialist and acupuncturist in M. D. Anderson's Integrative Medicine Program and the study's first author, noted that patients with xerostomia may also develop nutritional deficits that can become irreversible.

Garcia, Chambers and their team of researchers conducted a pilot study to determine whether acupuncture could reverse xerostomia. Acupuncture therapy is based on the ancient Chinese practice of inserting and manipulating very thin needles at precise points on the body to relieve pain or otherwise restore health. In traditional Chinese medicine, stimulating these points is believed to improve the flow of vital energy through the body. Contemporary theories about acupuncture's benefits include the suggestion that needle manipulation stimulates natural substances that dilate blood vessels and increase blood flow to different areas of the body.

The M. D. Anderson study included 19 patients with xerostomia who had completed radiation therapy at least four weeks earlier. The patients were given two acupuncture treatments each week for four weeks. The acupuncture points used in the treatment were located on the ears, chin, index finger, forearm and lateral surface of the leg. All patients were tested for saliva flow and asked to complete self-assessments and questionnaires related to their symptoms and quality of life before the first treatment, after completion of four weeks of acupuncture, and again four weeks later.

The twice weekly acupuncture treatments produced highly statistically significant improvements in symptoms. Measurement tools included: the Xerostomia Inventory, asking patients to rate the dryness of their mouth and other related symptoms; and the Patient Benefit Questionnaire, inquiring about issues such as mouth and tongue discomfort; difficulties in speaking, eating and sleeping; and use of oral comfort aids. A quality-of-life assessment conducted at weeks five and eight showed significant improvements over quality-of-life scores recorded at the outset of the study.

"In this pilot study, patients with severe xerostomia who underwent acupuncture showed improvements in physical well-being and in subjective symptoms," Dr. Chambers said. "Although the patient population was small, the positive results are encouraging and warrant a larger trial to assess patients over a longer period of time."

Garcia said that a phase III, placebo-controlled trial is planned and is currently under review. She also noted that in other studies, the M. D. Anderson researchers are examining whether acupuncture can prevent xerostomia in patients treated for head and neck cancer, not just treat it.

May 08
New Studies Find Babies To Be Brainier Than Many Imagine
A new study from Northwestern University shows what many mothers already know: their babies are a lot smarter than others may realize.

Though only five months old, the study's cuties indicated through their curious stares that they could differentiate water in a glass from solid blue material that looked very much like water in a similar glass.

The finding that infants can distinguish between solids and liquids at such an early age builds upon a growing body of research that strongly suggests that babies are not blank slates who primarily depend on others for acquiring knowledge. That's a common assumption of researchers in the not too distant past.

"Rather, our research shows that babies are amazing little experimenters with innate knowledge," Susan Hespos said. "They're collecting data all the time."

Hespos, an assistant professor of psychology at Northwestern, is lead author of the study, which will appear in the May 2009 issue of Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

In a test with one group of infants in the study, a researcher tilted a glass filled with blue water back and forth to emphasize the physical characteristics of the substance inside. Another group of babies looked at a glass filled with a blue solid resembling water, which also was moved back and forth to demonstrate its physical properties.

Next all the infants were presented with test trials that alternated between the liquid or solid being transferred between two glasses.

According to the well-established looking-time test, babies, like adults, look significantly longer at something that is new, unexpected or unpredictable.

The infants who in their first trials observed the blue water in the glass looked significantly longer at the blue solid, compared to the liquid test trials. The longer stares indicated the babies were having an "Aha!" moment, noticing the solid substance's difference from the liquid. The infants who in their first trials observed the blue solid in the glass showed the opposite pattern. They looked longer at the liquid, compared to the solid test trials.

"As capricious as it may sound, how long a baby looks at something is a strong indicator of what they know," Hespos said. "They are looking longer because they detect a change and want to know what is going on."

The five-month-old infants were able to discriminate a solid from a similar-looking liquid based on movement cues, or on how the substances poured or tumbled out of upended glasses.

In a second experiment, the babies also first saw either liquid or a similar-looking solid in a glass that was tipped back and forth. This time, both groups of infants next witnessed test trials in which a cylindrical pipe was lowered into either the liquid-filled glass or the solid-containing glass.

The outcomes were similar to those of the previous experiment. Infants who first observed the glass with the liquid looked longer in the subsequent test when the pipe was lowered onto the solid. Likewise, the infants who looked at the solid in their first trials stared longer when later the pipe was lowered into the liquid.

The motion cues led to distinct expectations about whether an object would pass through or remain on top of the liquid or solid, the Northwestern researchers noted.

"Together these experiments provide the earliest evidence that infants have expectations about the physical properties of liquids," the researchers concluded in the Psychological Science study.

May 06
Type Of Lung Cancer Screening Used To Detect Disease May Impact 5-year Survival Rates
Dr. Hisao Asamura and his team of researchers at The National Cancer Center Hospital in Tokyo, Japan examined the records of 2,281 patients who underwent lung cancer resection surgery between 2000 and 2006. The study was published in the May issue of the Journal of Thoracic Oncology, the official journal of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Dr. Asamura and his team found that after classifying patients based on the technique used to diagnose their lung cancer, either through CT scans or x-rays, there was a marked difference in five-year survival rates. Those patients diagnosed using CT scans had a 91.2 percent 5-year survival rate while those diagnosed with x-rays demonstrated a 77.8 percent survival rate.

The researchers also divided the patients into groups based on the detection type, including screen detection, symptom detection and incidental detection. The patients that demonstrated the highest five-year survival rates were those diagnosed through screening (79.6 percent) and then those diagnosed because of symptoms (74.6 percent). The patients that were diagnosed incidentally demonstrated the lowest five-year survival rate (64.6 percent).

The study findings demonstrate the impact of lung cancer screening, particularly though CT-scans, can have on improving patient prognosis by detecting the disease at an early stage. The accuracy of CT scans allow physicians to detect cancerous growths while the tumor is at an early stage and physically smaller, making it more operable. With lung cancer prognosis and survival depending heavily on the stage of the disease upon diagnosis, it is important to keep findings such as these in mind.

Browse Archive